No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service :: essays research papers

No Shoes, No Shirt, No ServiceFor the past few months, I confirm been focusing on the events and the principles behind the launching of our nation. During these studies, I often wondered how some of the ideas we cling to became entrenched in our paradigms of perception. For instance, there are words that have become taboo because of the ways they have been used. They are so taboo, in fact, that it has become nearly impossible to use the words constructively, because using them either shuts off the mechanism in the brain that controls attention span, or their mentioning automatically invites a defensive posture. Two of the unwitting victims are the words "politics" and "discrimination." The demise of valid uses of these words is sadly apparent when we discuss the numeral of "free trade" with China. First, since negotiations with foreign governments can only justly and efficiently be done through representation of our hold government, the issue inherently involves politics. in that location is no way of getting around it. Second, the decision is really whether or not to discriminate against the Chinese government fundamentally on the basis that we do not agree with their methods of controlling internal civil affairs. Are we right to presume we have the authority to judge the actions of a foreign government when our own government has, in fact, from time to time, been guilty of many of the same things we accuse the Chinese government of doing? One might be inclined to profess that we have no authority to judge, lest we open up the possibility of allowing ourselves to be judged. However, if we are just and consistent, is thatDickens 2such a terrible proposition? composition America is proud of its diversity, that diversity should not be used to steal our attention from the common, unifying principles, which sets America apart from the rest of the world. They are the principles outlined in the Declaration of Independence. Without thos e principles, we have no claim to freedom, so Im not certain why there is an effort to categorically reject them. Retail establishments are knowing to decide with whom they will do business based on criteria that is not necessarily relevant to a persons quality or depth of character. Patrons must be wearing certain articles of clothing, or they are not admitted. No shirt, no shoes, no service. Many of the more highly rated restaurants even require a come on and tie for their customers.